I agreeto Idea Alternatives for Status, Power and Money

19 votes

I disagreeto Idea Alternatives for Status, Power and Money

Rank9

Idea#52

This idea is active.
Sessions »

Alternatives for Status, Power and Money

Length:
60

Status and power are two of the 10 intrinsic motivators in the "champfrogs" scale. We cannot deny that some people are intrinsically motivated by status and power. These people will, quite naturally, enjoy their high positions in a corporate hierarchy. In fact, such hierarchies *attract* people with such intrinsic motivation. We also cannot deny that some people are (extrinsically) motivated by large sums of money.

It is very difficult to convince such people to be intrinsically motivated by curiosity, honor, acceptance, mastery, or any of the other motivators. Maybe we should use a different approach...

Can we come up with alternatives _without_ changing this kind of motivation?

Can we help managers to gain more status, power and/or money in a _network_ instead of a hierarchy?

Can we use democracy or meritocracy to grow leaders who gain status, power and money through stewardship of the living, instead of management of the machine?

Comment

Submitted by jurgen 11 months ago

Vote Activity Show

Events

  1. The idea was posted
    11 months ago

Comments (3)

  1. What about adding another question: Who would have an interest in long-term investment into companies?

    Why am I asking this? Because there are companies that have outgrown average Wall Street companies by 6.9 times. The characteristics by which the leaders of these companies worked differed substantially from those dominating today’s companies.

    Shouldn’t, for example, pension funds have an interest and a say in selecting CxOs matching these characteristics?

    10 months ago
  2. Another something to explore may be this: Until 2008 it was believed that implementing best practices (the vast majority based on exact/linear techniques) would lead to new levels of efficiencies. It is since about 2008 that a new line of thinking can be observed. It can be described as: “We know that things must be done differently, but we don’t know how.” Management is now in a difficult position. Risk avoidance drives to use what has worked before (the best practices; they worked with low levels of complexity). The trouble is this: Much of what worked before does not work in today’s environments. It makes things worse. This leads to the need for two communications for senior management:

    (1) Clarity regarding the damaging effects of today’s practices

    (2) A practical way out

    10 months ago
  3. Go for it

    10 months ago